Search for: "Player v Player" Results 1 - 20 of 5,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2024, 11:41 am by Mark Tushnet
  Sunday’s NY Times had a story about “the network that took down Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2024, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
On October 30, 2023, a group of community members circulated a letter that seemingly accused head coach Marvin of player mistreatment and other misdeeds. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:05 pm by Ilya Somin
Being the child of an elite-college graduate may be correlated with academic ability, just as being the son of an NBA player may be correlated with basketball ability. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am by Eric Goldman
Section 230 says there can be only one defendant for those items of third-party content, and it isn’t the tertiary player Salesforce. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Savvy players, not just those in the environmental industrial complex, will find business opportunities to lead and profit in environmental and sustainability matters, including opportunities to monetize these newly enacted state laws. [read post]
  The patent relates in particular to what happens when an object (such as a player or the ball) blocks the TV camera’s view of the display boards. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Similarly, in dismissing the potential that a player of the video game may be an author of any of the artistic works in the composite frame images, Kitchin J denied that the player had either made contributions of an artistic kind, nor had they undertaken any of the arrangements necessary for the creation of the images (paragraph 106). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:41 am by Eric Goldman
WWE 2K Videogame Doesn’t Infringe Tattoo Copyright By Depicting Basketball Players–Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games Copyright and Tattoos: Hangover II Injunction Denied, But the Copyright Owner Got Some Good News Too–Whitmill v. [read post]