Search for: "Poole v. U. S" Results 1 - 20 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
 (Eric Lee/Pool via CNP/Polaris/Newscom)  In its important recent immigration decision in Department of State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Carstensen, Annkathrin Marschall, Pooling and Exchanging Competitively Sensitive Information Among Rivals: Absolutely Illegal Not Just Unreasonable, 92 U. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
Among the results of a successful removal to federal court is a different jury pool, a different judge, and different procedural rules such as the absence of video cameras in federal trials. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by ilyabeylin
  The opinion cites Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 2:56 am by Florian Mueller
The European Commission's U-turn on standard-essential patent (SEP) pools is remarkable and apparently attributable to lobbying by certain parties, facilitated by DG GROW's mistake of relying on an adviser whose business benefits from complex licensing processes entailing many bilateral negotiations (and disputes). [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 7 February, the Full Federal Court upheld Justice Thawley’s finding, dismissing Facebook Inc’s appeal. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 5:04 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
” The Ninth Circuit further bolstered its result by noting that “[u]sing a random or sequential number generator to select from a pool of customer-provided phone numbers would not cause the harms contemplated by Congress. [read post]