Search for: "Portland General Electric Company v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
To unite the country. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm
The Tribal Business Council of the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Portland General Electric Company v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
Lastly, Norges Bank has announced its decisions to revoke the exclusions of Empire District Electric Company and Anglo American PLC; and to end the observation of EDP - Energias de Portugal S.A, Endesa S.A., Portland General Electric Co (PGE), and Enel SpA. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:35 pm
Portland General Electric Company (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Clean Water Act)Butler v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:26 pm
But new technology is changing that: people can generate electricity straight from the sun by installing panels on their roofs, and soon it will be more cost effective to install batteries to hold that power for when it is needed than to continue paying the power company. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
United States, No. 2009-5135 (Fed. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
In Rozenblat v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
(EDI) gas collection systems is treated and then used to generate electricity. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:21 am
General Electric Co. 433 F.2d 109 (1st Cir.1970). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
A federal inspection of the company’s Jesse Hunton Viola Unit, an oil field production facility in Pontotoc County, Oklahoma, on November 9, 2009, found the facility’s SPCC plan did not meet federal requirements, was not certified by a professional engineer, was not approved by the company’s management and did not designate the person accountable for spill prevention. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
— Mireya Navarroa, The New York Times, December 22, 2009 Air quality in the New York tri-state region stands to benefit from a court settlement requiring Duke Energy, one of the nation’s largest electric power companies, to drastically cut sulfur dioxide emissions from a coal-fired plant in Indiana, state and federal officials said Tuesday. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
— Mireya Navarroa, The New York Times, December 22, 2009 Air quality in the New York tri-state region stands to benefit from a court settlement requiring Duke Energy, one of the nation’s largest electric power companies, to drastically cut sulfur dioxide emissions from a coal-fired plant in Indiana, state and federal officials said Tuesday. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
