Search for: "Posey v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2021, 5:57 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
And, as the recent opinion of the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, in Posey v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Counsel's perspective | Mr Justice Nugee and the Superhose: The potentiality of disclosure | Dutch Court of Appeal injuncts unwilling licensee in first post-Huawei v ZTE FRAND decision | English High Court seizes patent infringement jurisdiction once again | No knowledge in secondary copyright infringement of Eminem's first album | Ariana Grande, thank you, next: copyright infringement on Instagram | DSM Directive is now Directive 2019/790 and Member States will need to… [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Rosie Burbidge reports on the Invista v Botes saga. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Plum and Posey Inc.Africa Correspondent Chijioke Okorie posts The proposed fair use exception under South [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
 The Federal Court of Canada, Phelan J., dismissed the claim of copyright infringement, stating that even if Pyrrha Design owned the copyright in the designs, Plum & Posey did not infringe it.The main questions raised by the Court in this case are the following:Does copyright subsist in any of the Pyrrha Designs because they are original artistic works? [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The review examines the overall state of the domestic news market, its financial sustainability, the role of digital advertising and social media. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
Posey, 32 Cal.4th 193, 218 (California Supreme Court 2004).People v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 pm
For example, Riverside’s computer database in Riverside Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]