Search for: "Powell v. Parker" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
On 30 March 2022 there was an application in the case of Watkins -v- Mackle. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am by Kevin
The court holds that they acted in bad faith and for an improper purpose—and not (as Powell claimed at the hearing) seeking to change the law like Thurgood Marshall did in Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am by MBettman
With viewpoints similar to their respective positions in Parker, the Chief and Justice Kennedy disagreed in their respective positions in State v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Since 1968, only three justices — Lewis Powell, William Rehnquist and Elena Kagan — have lacked judicial experience prior to joining the court. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Only one Justice, Lewis Powell, believed that the rule should differ; but since he was the swing vote, his position became the law. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am by Christopher Sagers
  If the Court takes the case, it would likely clarify the “foreseeability” test for clear articulation first formulated by Justice Powell—something of a foe of antitrust enforcement—in Town of Hallie v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
Parker, or uphold the Kelo takings. [read post]