Search for: "Power Marketing v. Ball"
Results 1 - 20
of 205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
With Monday’s oral arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
Trade secret: its scope is the whole ball game. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
While these market-destabilizing innovations demonstrate meaningful advancement and spectacular ingenuity in science, they also raise new questions about the nature of creativity in an age of machines that can make art. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:58 pm
If you need to know what the relevant arguments are from each side in Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
Musk is a one-man wrecking ball for Internet Law. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
This was marketing and newspaper term for old or new knives suitable for fighting, hunting, and utility. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 11:32 pm
The slightly postponed Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am
On the other side are cases like Rumsfeld v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
Ball State * Another School Violated a Student’s First Amendment Rights by Disciplining Her For Facebook Posts — R.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:17 pm
” In a separate interview, Abigail Barlow acknowledged that “That ball is thoroughly in Netflix’s court. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:32 am
Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 4:45 am
This criticism ignores a very basic concept in public international law, which is that a depositary of an international treaty does not have the power to decide whether or not that international treaty has come into force. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
