Search for: "Powers v. Arizona Department of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  Men in Minnesota are initially sent to the department of corrections’ prison in St. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
  See, “Illegal Alien” Is One of Many Correct Legal Terms for “Illegal Immigrant,” written by Alex Nowrasteh and published by Cato on October 14, 2019. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
States have also tried to go to court to enforce these laws in cases like Arizona v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am by Marty Lederman
  Even if a particular Justice concludes that most of Trump’s (and the Colorado Republican Party’s) many arguments are unavailing, Trump only needs to convince that Justice that one of those arguments is correct in order to preclude that Justice from voting to affirm. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
., and the United States – enjoy veto power over any actions the body might consider. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
  Likewise, Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from Scalia's opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
On remand, my friend Ilan Wurman, law professor at Arizona State, pushed the Appointments Clause argument (among others), but his arguments were rejected by District Judge James Wesley Hendrix; this appeal follows. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am by Ryan Goodman
That statute, 18 U.S.C. section 241, should not have been a surprise: it is a powerful and oft-used tool by prosecutors. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
You can read it in PDF, or below; we still have plenty of time to edit it, so we'd love to see any corrections or suggestions. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:48 pm by Unknown
Navajo Nation (Water rights) Department of the Interior v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
”More than fifty years ago, in Miranda v Arizona, the US Supreme Court warned about the dangers inherent in private settings and circumstances which allow state officials to subjugate and intimidate people. [read post]