Search for: "Preserve Endangered Areas v. US ARMY CORPS" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The regulation aims to preserve stored water to protect drinking water supplies, prevent salinity intrusion and algal blooms, and minimize impacts to fisheries and the environment. [read post]
The regulation aims to preserve stored water to protect drinking water supplies, prevent salinity intrusion and algal blooms, and minimize impacts to fisheries and the environment. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am by Rachel E. VanLandingham
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
Army Corps of Engineers to evaluate the impacts of several additional project approvals, including a resource management plan, a conservation plan for the endangered spineflower plant, a streambed alteration agreement, and two permits for the incidental take of protected species. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The Court will not hear an appeal of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision which reversed the lower court’s ruling that the State of Texas had violated the Endangered Species Act in its administration of the state water permitting program which allegedly denied adequate amounts of fresh water at the Aransas, Texas Whooping Crane preserve. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) jointly prepared the 5,828-page project level EIR, defining the project as a project-level EIR for the proposed resource management plan and conservation plan project components. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:48 am by Keith Rizzardi
Army Corps of Engineers, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 2163186 (9th Cir., June 1, 2010)(Circuit Judges O’Scannlain, Trott and Paez) SUMMARY: The Ninth Circuit, after considering whether the Army Corps, U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:08 pm by WIMS
We have already instructed all relevant parties to preserve any documents that may shed light on the facts surrounding this disaster. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– Michael Aubele, Valley News Dispatch, April 27, 2010 The federal Environmental Protection Agency and Allegheny County Health Department want a federal judge to sign off on an agreement with Allegheny Ludlum Corp. and Harsco Corp. intended to control slag dust at the Ludlum steel mill in Natrona. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]