Search for: "Price v. Georgia-Pacific Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
Case citation: Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:20 pm
Cl. 2021) (citing Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:27 am
Meyer, Ravgen’s damages expert, provided a reasonable royalty opinion based on a Georgia-Pacific hypothetical negotiation analysis. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
Lowery is the founder of the musical groups Cracker and Camper Van Beethoven and a lecturer at the University of Georgia Terry College of Business and is based in Athens, Georgia. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
An alternative approach that avoids these problems is the one developed by Judge James Robart in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:24 am
In the case, the District Court determined a “reasonable royalty” using the well-known framework established in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Georgia Sept. 22, 2014). [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:12 am
In one rather famous example, in December 1982, with Supreme Court oral arguments pending, plywood manufacturers settled a decade-old antitrust lawsuit filed by purchasers who charged Georgia-Pacific Corp., Weyerhaeuser Co. and Willamette Industries with price-fixing in violation of federal law. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Georgia Pacific Consumer Products, LP 13-41Issue: Whether the court of appeals erred in refusing to follow the holdings of the Eighth and Sixth Circuits involving identical trademark litigation and not giving those rulings preclusive effect – and doing so in ways that disregard the district courts’ inherent authority to consider preclusion and do serious violence to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 and the proper standards other circuits routinely follow when… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm
Classic Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
AnimalFeeds International Corp.; and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
Microsoft Corp., 632 F.3d 1292, 98 USPQ2d 1203 (Fed. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
The Deepwater Horizon oil spill and seafood prices. 40 Envtl. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
To support his royalty calculation, the expert adjusted the baseline royalty rate using the factors set out in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
To support his royalty calculation, the expert adjusted the baseline royalty rate using the factors set out in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
The royalty amount assumes that the party would still be able to make a reasonable profit by selling the article in the open market.[5] Generally, the determination of a reasonable royalty for accused patent infringement applies the well-established factors set forth in Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
