Search for: "Price v. Price et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
The full Delaware Supreme Court recently reversed the dismissal of a shareholder challenge to a private equity consortium’s acquisition of Inovalon HoldingsInc. after finding the cloud-based healthcare industry support provider’s directors did not fully reveal to investors the conflicted roles of the deal’s financial advisors, as the high court’s seminal MFW ruling requires, in City of… [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The State of Texas, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The State of Texas, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 pm
Carole Johnson, et al. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Where companies have the freedom to negotiate more bespoke terms, they would be well advised to seek including a pricing escalation provision to control a vendor’s ability to increase prices over time after the parties have entered into the contract. [read post]
24 May 2024, 11:03 am
CPU Litigation, Bledsoe et al v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Case 1: Baldessari Trust v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Additionally, most negotiations had to take place quickly and often in auctions promoted by the Nazis, resulting in property being sold at prices below their actual market value. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:41 pm
Palkon et. al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 pm
Johnson & Johnson, et. al., D.N.J., No. 1:24-cv-00671 (Feb. 5, 2024). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
One of the hallmarks of PCCE is that it brings together academics, regulators, and industry professionals, and allows us to have candid conversations about corporate misconduct and the ways in which we can all work together to improve compliance. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 7:07 am
Johnson & Johnson et. al., D.N.J., No. 1:24-cv-00671 (Feb. 5, 2024)) over alleged excessive prescription drug costs takes a new approach with respect to familiar claims of breach of fiduciary duty for failure to monitor plan costs. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
Does 1-2 et. al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
Nazemian et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Tex. 2001). [7] See Torben Andersen et al., A Descriptive Study of High-Frequency Trade and Quote Options Data, 19 J. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
If the Supreme Court were writing today, it might well note that peer review is often a feature of bad science, advanced by scientists who know that peer-reviewed publication is the price of admission to the advocacy arena. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:13 am
The case is entitled Adams et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
