Search for: "Price v. State of Montana et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
The tax gain for North Carolina is likely less than the tax loss for New York, while the lower effective (tax-reduced) price reduces costs for New York smokers. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
The prices on the web of Amazon e-books, Steam-powered computer games,[6] and Staples office supplies differ based on where the user accesses their sites.[7] In these and many other ways, [g]eoblocking enhances market partitioning on the Internet by enabling content and service providers to limit access by users to information about certain goods, services, and/or prices, thereby enabling the providers to discriminate among different markets and offer different goods and services… [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 1:28 pm
The court’s full ruling in State of Louisiana et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
Given the high level of taxation on tobacco products—on average, excise taxes alone make up 40 percent of the retail price—a menthol prohibition will assuredly reduce revenues both for federal and state governments, while it is less likely that the policy will yield significant benefits in terms of smoking cessation. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit margins… [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
Pappas et al. (2007) find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[13] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[14] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit… [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Amgen Inc., et al., 15-1039 and Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:43 am
Case Background In Navarro et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 4:16 am
In Big Sky Colony et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Title: PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am
Amicus brief for the Montana Farm Bureau Federation and the Cato InstituteAmicus brief for the Edison Electric Institute et al.Amicus brief for the Montana Water Resources AssociationPetitioner's replyCVSG Information:Invited: November 1, 2010Filed: May 20, 2011 (Deny) Title: Applera Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:54 am
Bayer AG, et al. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
Amicus brief for the Center for Family Policy and Practice, et al.Amicus brief of the Constitution ProjectBrief of South Carolina Department of Social Services in oppositionBrief of Rebecca Price in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: Fox v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
The issue in Keating, et al., v. [read post]
