Search for: "Pro Se Services Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 511
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Decision Denying intervention, Justice Ruchelsman took a narrow view of the intervention statutes, writing: “admittedly, the proposed intervenors are all pro se individuals seeking to join this derivative action. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, regarding the illegality of [similar] swapping schemes under the AKS. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Evan Brown
Pro se plaintiff sued Meta seeking to hold it liable for allegedly removing certain “Muslim and/or Palestinian content” while preserving “unspecified Jewish and/or Israeli content” and for allegedly banning certain Muslim users, while allowing unspecified Jewish users to continue using Meta’s services. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
The entry order deals with whether a non-attorney guardian can act on behalf of a ward as a pro se litigant. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Stating an opinion about the merits of an issue or the claim by itself isn’t disqualifying per se, but additional facts might establish grounds for disqualification. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:25 am by Eric Goldman
Strachan sued Facebook pro se for breach of contract and the good faith/fair dealing implied covenant. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 10:35 am by Bob Ambrogi
Trust & Will, a digital estate planning and settlement platform, was named to the Inc. 5000 list of the fastest-growing private companies and was awarded a Smart Money Award for Best Financial Services for Families & Children by Real Simple magazine. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm by Sasha Volokh
This introduces a certain pro-privatization bias into the Appointments Clause. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
UBS Europe SE (f/k/a UBS (Luxembourg) S.A.), the BLMIS trustee brought fraudulent- transfer claims, seeking to avoid and recover direct and subsequent transfers of alleged customer property against (a) two related offshore feeder funds (Funds) that were the initial transferees from BLMIS and (b) a number of European banks, brokers, and related persons that were the subsequent transferees (Subsequent Transferees)and had acted as advisers and service providers to the Funds.21 The… [read post]