Search for: "Processed Plastic Co. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Obtaining study protocols, and in some instances, underlying data, are necessary for due process in the gatekeeping process. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
BeckerTime’s argument that its customization work was allowed under the so-called misnomer exception in Champion Spark Plug Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Indeed, allegedly “there is not a single program that accepts toothpaste tubes of any kind” in California or in the United States” “because of the processing concerns that they pose. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Many fundamentals of law and procedure do remain constant for some time, but, as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom has said, the Canadian Constitution and, by extension, the law itself, are expected to change and evolve. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Or does the nominee intend to serve as a faithful representative of an activist stockholder or a special interest group (favoring, for example, immediate voluntary carbon reduction or the elimination of plastic packaging)? [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
In the third edition’s chapter on statistics, David Kaye and co-author, the late David A. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Chris Skelton
Specific concerns may arise for LGBTQ+ foreign nationals seeking to come to the United States, or for LGBTQ+ service members in the U.S. armed forces. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
  On count one of the plaintiff’s complaint, seeking enforcement of the California judgment, the trial court found that the California court lacked personal jurisdiction over Joan Frank due to insufficient service of process but that ‘‘the substituted service of process on George Frank was valid. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
When discovery ended in early January 2020, Care One moved for summary judgment, seeking a determination that plaintiff could not assert a claim based on Care One's breach of any state or federal statutes or regulations. [read post]