Search for: "Protect Our Benefits v. City & Co. of San Francisco"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
City & County of San Francisco (Cal. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
San Francisco Deputy City Attorney Owen Clements presented the public entities' position. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
App’x 76); the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:16 am
The City of San Francisco yanked $3.5 million in social services contracts from the Salvation Army when it refused, for religious reasons, to provide benefits to its employees’ same-sex partners. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
FRANCISCO "FRANK" LOPEZ, Respondent. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans,[1] 517 U.S. 620 (1996) (equal protection limitations)· City of EastLake v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
In Koontz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 209. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Glendening, 709 A.2d 1230 (Md. 1988) and City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Exemptions Protect Tustin Ranch v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
Sierra Railway Co. (1907) 151 Cal. 113, 115 [plaintiff is entitled to “[s]uch reasonable sum . [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, involves a Second Amendment challenge to a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them on their persons. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
“The president of the Two Chinese Christian Councils of Huangshi city explained to believer [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:33 am
City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal. 4th 203, which interpreted that standard under FEHA as follows: To support a claim for unlawful discrimination or retaliation under FEHA, an employee must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a protected category was a substantial motivating factor in the denial of an employment benefit. (2 C.C.R. 11009(c)). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding the application of “facilities” to unlined landfills, the court, relying on Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Our second new relist is Bruce v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
This Newsletter also appears as a post on our website Taber Law Group every Monday. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San Francisco Public Utilities… [read post]
