Search for: "Public Citizen, Appellant, v. Department of State, Appellee" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
The statute's language, the anti-Chinese statements from Florida's public officials, and SB 264's impact establish that the law is a blanket ban against Chinese non-citizens from purchasing land within the state. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:01 am by MBettman
Little, Zeiger, Tiggs & Little LLP Columbus, for Appellant WBNS-TV Jason Manion, Deputy Solicitor, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, for Amicus State of Ohio in Support of Appellant WBNS-TV Sonia T. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am by MBettman
Singletary, Chief Counsel Civil Division, Law Department, City of Cleveland, for Appellee City of Cleveland State’s Argument Lima resolves this case. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am by MBettman
Hardwick, Assistant Public Defender, Office of the Ohio Public Defender, Columbus, for Appellee Carlos Romero State’s Argument The plea form signed by Mr. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:43 pm by Charles Kuck
I represent the appellees Rigo Rivera, Josafat Santillan, and the other young women and men behind me, all of whom hold valid DACA approvals.On June 15, 1982 the Supreme Court of the United States issued its landmark decision in Plyer v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Department of Health and Human Services, 14-1453; Zubik v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Stephens 15-187Issue: (1) Whether a federal court of appeals is authorized to review sua sponte and invalidate an order reopening the time to appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6), when the appellee never appealed the order; (2) whether attorney abandonment, which Maples v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:33 pm by Patricia Salkin
Taxpayers Bryan Sullins, Kerri Sullins, and Charles Williams filed suit against Pulaski County, Central Arkansas Water, and Buddy Villines in his capacity as Pulaski County Judge (appellees), claiming that appellees had entered into an agreement which necessitated Central Arkansas Water to expend public funds illegally. [read post]