Search for: "Query v. U.s.*"
Results 1 - 20
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 11:23 am
In P.D. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
Section 702 Query Procedure Reform Congress recently added the requirement for query procedures to Section 702. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:21 am
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit handed down a mixed decision in Chewy, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
Tool Without a Handle: Are You Not Trained? [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Similarly, the SEC and the other regulatory users of CAT have little incentive to be judicious in their use of CAT queries.[5] The SROs, which in the funding model before us today bear a third of the cost, do care about constraining costs.[6] They have pushed back on certain elements of the plan and are even litigating with us on some features of CAT. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 4:07 am
In Yeaw v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
From Ford v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
Specifically, audit trail logs must contain, among other elements: 7.1.8 Type of Action (for example: creations additions, deletions changes, queries, accesses, copy, print, and copy and paste)—Specifies inquiry, any changes made (with pointer to original data state), and a delete specification (with a pointer to deleted information).3 Indeed, “[f]ull transparency of modifications or deletions or both is mandatory…record changes shall not obscure previously recorded… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
I will also update this with any response I receive from Microsoft, to whom I sent a media query about the case. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
The need for something like FISA was made clear as early as 1972, when the Supreme Court ruled in the famous Keith Case that electronic collection in domestic security cases fell within the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement as set forth in Katz v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Why § 230 Likely Doesn't Provide Immunity for Libels Composed by ChatGPT, Bard, etc.
27 Mar 2023, 9:30 am
Trade Comm'n v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 12:53 pm
Toland v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:46 pm
That lawsuit, Jewel v. [read post]
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
The security request was especially acute due to Russia’s constant pretensions over Crimea following the collapse of the U.S.S.R. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:16 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am
ShareTuesday’s argument in Health and Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
There’s the possibility that Ring and the police are working on coordinating Ring videos with face recognition Ring effectively “took the 5th” on this query, in its refusal to answer the Senator’s question on this issue. [read post]
