Search for: "Quinones v. Quinones" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2023, 2:24 pm by Amy Howe
Nine years after Brown’s trial, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Montana Department of Revenue, [Abstract], 62 South Texas Law Review 13-38 (2022).Eva Quinones, My Body Broken for You: The Case for Overriding Religious Medical Exemptions for Minors, [Abstract], 29 Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law 170-204 (2022). [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “”The nature and degree of the penalty to be imposed pursuant to CPLR 3126 against a party who refuses to comply with court-ordered discovery is a matter within the discretion of the court” (Smookler v Dicerbo, 166 AD3d 838, 839 [2018]; see Pastore v Utilimaster Corp., 165 AD3d 685, 686 [2018]; Quinones v Long Is. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The nature and degree of the penalty to be imposed pursuant to CPLR 3126 against a party who refuses to comply with court-ordered discovery is a matter within the discretion of the court” (Smookler v Dicerbo, 166 AD3d 838, 839 [2018]; see Pastore v Utilimaster Corp., 165 AD3d 685, 686 [2018]; Quinones v Long Is. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“”The nature and degree of the penalty to be imposed pursuant to CPLR 3126 against a party who refuses to comply with court-ordered discovery is a matter within the discretion of the court” (Smookler v Dicerbo, 166 AD3d 838, 839 [2018]; see Pastore v Utilimaster Corp., 165 AD3d 685, 686 [2018]; Quinones v Long Is. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:04 pm
The prosecution described Quinones’s trial performance as “a bunch of crazy stuff. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Along the way, the trial court clarifies how to properly charge the jury on punitive damages under the City law.The case is Duarte v. [read post]