Search for: "R. I. L.C." Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2021, 3:24 am by Xandra Kramer
The ruling stayed proceedings commenced by Central Santa Lucía L.C., a US corporation, against Meliá Hotels International S.A., on grounds of sovereign immunity. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
"[I]t should go without saying that [a] judge's opinions and orders belong in the public domain. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:00 am by Nico Cordes
Höfer only confirmed that such a request (see above I.1.) had been brought forward by the respondent at the beginning of the oral proceedings, what has not been denied by the Board.2. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 10:34 am by Administrator
I‑2 (désormais remplacée par la Loi sur l’immigration et la protection des réfugiés, L.C. 2001, ch. 27). [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
And here's Part I, which argues that authors have long based characters on real people, and have a constitutional right to do so: Creators have long worked real famous people into their fictional stories, and they have a First Amendment right to do so. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:32 am by Xandra Kramer
Schaafsma, ‘Editorial: Private International law and intellectual property’, p. 685-686 (guest editor) Paul L.C. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am by Eugene Volokh
My students Daniel Korda, Melanie Rollins, and Sam Sazer and I filed an amicus brief in the case on behalf of the Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment, arguing in favor of the result that the court just reached. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:06 pm by Michael Smith
 That’s In re Garrison-Ashburn, L.C., 253 B.R. 700 (Bankr. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
The classic statement of the rationale behind this rule was made over 150 years ago by Brougham L.C. in Greenough v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:15 am by Peter Mahler
App. 2014], and CCD, L.C. v Millsap, 116 P.3d 373 [Utah 2005], as cases in which the courts upheld orders of dissociation. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
Here are the facts (from the court’s opinion): Advertisements featuring three minor girls, J.S., S.L., and L.C. [read post]