Search for: "R. V. B."
Results 1 - 20
of 23,324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am
Examples of acts which have, in the past, met the actus reus standard for a section 86 offence include: Storing a firearm in a glovebox (see: R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC)) Storing a firearm in a dresser (see: R v McDonald, 2016 BCSC 1648 (CanLII)) Storing a firearm by a furnace (see: R v Roussel, 2014 ABQB 202 (CanLII)) The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea) The mens rea or the guilty mind speaks to the accused’s degree of intent during the… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
Accessing child pornography (4.1) Every person who accesses any child pornography is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of six months. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:27 am
This was discussed in the case of R v McSween (2020), ONCA 343 (CanLII). [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Francis, asking if she believed women should have access to Plan B. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
R. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
R. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 2:28 pm
R. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 12:08 pm
Hishon v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:05 pm
R. 41(b). [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:05 pm
R. 41(b). [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am
Mr C’s position was that of a person in ‘accommodation plus’ need, as per R (Aburas) v London Borough of Southwark (2019) EWHC 2754 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:23 am
R. [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm
On révision au fond, see ibid, 185. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
Under Illinois v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]