Search for: "R. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance et al" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:20 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Holder (Susan SEVEN–SKY, Also Known as Susan Sevensky, et al., Appellants v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:57 am
June 25, 2015 On June 18, 2015, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of King, et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by Mailee Smith
Smith, Staff Counsel at Americans United for Life (Counsel of Record for Drury Development Corporation et al. in Sebelius v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:20 am
Hope Healthcare Center, et al., Asia Myers was employed as a certified nursing assistant (CNA) at Hope Healthcare Center in Westland, Michigan for approximately three years before she became pregnant. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The pills were ultimately sold to wholesale prescription drug distribution companies ("corrupt distribution companies"), which then sold them to pharmacies and to other wholesale prescription distribution drug companies across the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:05 am by Derek Dissinger
I was likely not alone as the interest over National Federation of Independent Business, et al v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
The Supreme Court's Healthcare Ruling and the Making of a New Tax By R. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services, et. al.) has struck down a key portion of DOMA, saying that for the federal government to deny legally married, same-sex couples health benefits is unconstitutional. [read post]