Search for: "R.C. Fischer " Results 1 - 20 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am by MBettman
Therefore, R.C. 2107.15—Ohio’s voiding statute—does not apply to a noncomplying will under R.C. 2107.24. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:31 am by MBettman
Justice Fischer’s Dissent Justice Fischer thinks a deposition does fall within the meaning of “proceeding” as that term is used in R.C. 2303.21. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 4:54 am by MBettman
R. 11 and provided the deportation advisement pursuant to R.C 2943.031, and when counsel had warned defendant that his guilty plea would place him into deportation proceedings with limited options for relief. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:01 am by MBettman
Justice Fischer’s Position: Specifics of this Judicial Decree Not Met Justice Fischer disagrees with the lead opinion’s finding that R.C. 3107.07(A) is unambiguous, in part evidenced by the differing views of it taken by the parties, lower courts, and the justices in this case. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:40 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices Fischer,* French, Stewart, and DeWine *Justice Fischer would also accept the appeal on proposition of law No. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:58 am by MBettman
R.C. 2943.031(A) (Prior to accepting a plea of guilty, the court must address the defendant and advise the defendant that his plea may result in deportation from the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:44 am by MBettman
” Justice Fischer, opinion of the Court On February 19, 2020 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am by MBettman
Thus, the Third District held that Rasawehr’s conduct was done for the illegitimate purposes proscribed by R.C. 2903.211 and therefore was not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:55 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices French, DeWine, Donnelly, and Stewart No: Chief Justice O’ Connor and Justices Kennedy and Fischer Belinda’s Propositions of Law Accepted for Review Proposition of Law 1 A party’s request for custody does not constitute a complete abrogation of the physician-patient privilege under R.C. 3217.02(B) [sic.] where the mental and physical health records do not relate to the party’s ability to parent (Belinda appears to be… [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:21 am by MBettman
Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices Fischer, Donnelly, and Stewart voted for dismissal. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:13 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices French, Fischer, DeWine, and Donnelly* No: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices Kennedy and Stewart *Justices French, DeWine, and Donnelly would accept the appeal on both propositions of law. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am by MBettman
The state believes that under the final appealable order statute, R.C. 2505.02, there is an adequate remedy for the defendant following a judgment of conviction if that happens. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 5301.25(A) (“All deeds . . . and instruments of writing properly executed for the conveyance or encumbrance of lands . . . shall be recorded in the office of the county recorder . . . . [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices Kennedy, French, DeWine, Fischer*, and former Justice O’Donnell *Would accept the appeal on proposition of law No. 1 only. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:25 am by MBettman
” Justice Fischer, to counsel for the defendant On December 10, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]