Search for: "RAMSEY v. KENNEDY"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
" I agree with Ramsey. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Use expressio unis to get at the fact that the noncommercial use holding is limited to situations where the challenged use is “used as a mark for a commercial product”; the term noncommercial use can reasonably include uses as a mark for political speech—Robert Kennedy, Jr., is using his father’s famous name to promote himself politically (also highlighting the importance of small differences when it comes to speech in the political realm). [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:31 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
It is reported that JonBenet Ramsey’s Brother has settled his $750 Million libel claim against CBS over a documentary which posited that he had killed his six year old sister. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 2:48 am
Georgia and Gregg v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
In Matal v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Ashcroft and Golan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 11:20 pm
According to Eskridge, Justice Kennedy’s 1996 opinion in Romer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:55 pm
In a recent SCOTUSblog symposium, Yale Law School Professor William Eskridge – probably the leading academic defender of same-sex marriage – offers an originalist justification for striking down laws banning same-sex marriage: Upon reflection, I believe that Justice Kennedy’s opinion in Romer[v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:31 am
Painter (1950) and Brown v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
Fifth Breakout Session Copyright Theory Shyamkrishna Balganesh, The Uneasy Case Against Copyright Trolls Three things: unpack the idea of copyright trolling, an undertheorized idea compared to patent trolling. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
Michael Ramsey and Donald Childress have posts as part of this blog’s continuing symposium on next Term’s Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
The NFIB v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
The NFIB v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
It would have signaled that the longstanding and pivotal precedent Wickard v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:06 am
As Kennedy put it for the Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
[and] Justice Kennedy will likely hold the deciding vote. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Hill and Gertz v. [read post]
