Search for: "RENDER V. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 18,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
First, following Curistan v Times Newspapers [2009] QB 231, qualified privilege operates so that the relevant privileged words are ignored for defamation purposes, at least as far as meaning is concerned, except insofar as they provide context for non-privileged words [56]. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:51 am by Kelly Bachich Sheehan
In the 2012 United States Supreme Court case National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am by Yousuf Syed Khan
Under international humanitarian law (IHL) applicable in both IACs and NIACs, it is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove, or render useless OIS (Additional Protocol I, Article 54; Additional Protocol II, Article 14, which are both considered customary IHL and therefore applicable irrespective of whether a State has ratified them). [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:10 pm by Brett Trout
  The Graham Factors In a blow to General Motors and other current and aspiring design patent holders and patent lawyers the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has just ruled in LKQ CORPORATION v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:18 am by Felix Le Roux
The case is Prosec Guards CC v Department of Public Works and Infrastructure and Others (2501/23; 2502/23) [2024] ZAWCHC 139 (24 May 2024). [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  If the Court were to adopt the view that this is not enough to render a lab report testimonial, then it would be a simple matter for labs always to avoid the rule of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]