Search for: "RILEY PLEAS v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by Deborah J. Merritt
United States 2001); and data stored on a cell phone (Riley v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
United States A new privacy bill is pending in Massachusetts would be the most revolutionary data-privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by Matthew Tokson
” This is an unusual way to treat non-dicta Supreme Court reasoning that was central to the holdings of cases like Riley v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 5:25 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
” The court held that Deuble had an expectation of privacy in his phone’s notification screen based on the Supreme Court’s holding in Riley v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 11 December 2020 Collins-Rice J heard an application to  strike out the defence in the case of Riley v Sivier. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
The court rejected Lewis's objection stating, `I'm imposing 6[.n.], all of it. [read post]