Search for: "ROBERT MAY V. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2020, 3:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
Nebraska); and allowing religious institutions to keep teaching while barring secular institutions from doing so may well violate the Free Speech Clause and the Establishment Clause (see Texas Monthly, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  (This is the deep meaning of the fact, for example, that four of the American states—Massachusetts, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky (originally, of course, part of Virginia)—styled themselves as “commonwealths,” i.e., communities organized around the seeking of a common good. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Beshear, 957 F.3d 610 (6th Cir. 2020) (finding the Governor's ban on drive-in church services unconstitutional); Roberts v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 9:50 pm by Josh Blackman
Roberts do not seek to insulate themselves from the Commonwealth's general public health guidelines. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Start with the claim under Commonwealth law—Kentucky's Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 6 January 2020, Besanko J gave judgment in the case of Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications [2020] FCA 2 dismissing an application for disclosure of confidential sources. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:22 am by Bob Hoffer
The Kentucky Supreme Court decision in Northern Kentucky Area Development District v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
The opinion is from the Court of Appeals of Kentucky:  Kays v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:03 am by Robert Natelson (guest-blogging)
That amendment, if adopted, may well have prevented the Civil War; and because it limited the expansion of slavery to territories not well suited for it, the amendment may have placed the “peculiar institution” on track toward extinction. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:30 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  In the case of Kentucky murderer Robert Keith Woodall, the Kentucky Supreme Court held that there was no requirement to give the jury a "no adverse influence" instruction and found Mitchell distinguishable. [read post]
29 May 2013, 2:46 pm by Robert L Abell
The Kentucky Supreme Court ruled it was not and ordered a new trial in Grubb v Norton Hospital, No 2010-SC-532 (May 23, 2013). [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:00 pm by WIMS
 The Appeals Court explains that Plaintiffs-Appellants Kentucky Riverkeeper, Inc., Kentucky Waterways Alliance, Inc., and Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:38 am by Robert L Abell
The Kentucky Court of Appeals has assured us that Kentucky's Dram Shop Act did survive its decision in Taylor v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
The Kentucky Supreme-4-Court addressed the issue of jurisdiction related to UIFSA in Nordike v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
The Kentucky Supreme-4-Court addressed the issue of jurisdiction related to UIFSA in Nordike v. [read post]