Search for: "RODRIGUEZ-GRAVE V. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 11:15 am by fjhinojosa
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am by Patricia Hughes
The government commissioned research projects to review the state of knowledge on these issues, “given the clinical, legal, cultural, ethical, and historical context in Canada”, from the Council of Canadian Academies, which issued their three reports in December 2018. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
More likely the state will do what elites do everywhere--they ignore these engagements and to the extent possible undermine their authors. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm by Michael Madison
But it would be a grave mistake for schools to increase enrollments where there is no evidence that the number of entry-level law jobs will increase in the foreseeable future. [read post]