Search for: "ROGERS v. IVES"
Results 1 - 20
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
A Short Response to Roger Parloff and Others (1/24/24). [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Saarinen v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Saarinen v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:06 am
[iv] Garrison v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:01 am
More on that in Part V tomorrow, plus some big picture thoughts. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:04 pm
Circuit (Senior Judge Rogers writing) upheld D.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:48 am
Rogers, 68 N.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 12:05 pm
In Orozco v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Rogers v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:22 pm
West v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 1:29 pm
The Draft Bill excludes certain employment-related data, or “employee data,” defined as (i) applicant information; (ii) business contact information; (iii) emergency contact information; and (iv) benefits related information. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 8:00 am
Neal v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:06 am
In determining the payment of civil monetary penalties (in the event the regulated entity and OCR cannot not come to a settlement), OCR is directed to consider multiple factors including (i) the nature and extent of the HIPAA violation; (ii) the harm resulting from the violation; (iii) the regulated entity’s history with respect to compliance with the HIPAA rules; (iv) the financial condition of the regulated entity, including its size, and (v) recognized security practices. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda: THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020) July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing these comments. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Douglass’s aggressively textualist anti-slavery reading of the Constitution is riveting when read just a few pages after Roger Taney’s extra-textual Dred Scott decision. [read post]
