Search for: "ROLLE V. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,372
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Recommendations The kinds of recommendations that are the subject of the Final Rule’s test track the three categories the DOL had included in its Proposal: Post-Rollover Investments – Recommendations as to the advisability of acquiring, holding, disposing of, or exchanging, securities or other investment property, as to investment strategy, or as to how securities or other investment property should be invested after the securities or other investment property are rolled… [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
The efficient markets hypothesis is over 50 years old.Basic v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am
State. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am
The decision went further than even the Trump Administration had dared in rolling back environmental protections. [read post]
6 May 2024, 12:14 am
Reference: Counterman v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am
Unsmooth Starting When your Super Duty rolled off the lot, it started up immediately, [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
” Dobyne v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 1:32 pm
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:00 am
New York (2024) 601 U.S. ____[1] and El Papel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:58 am
” Tellez v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 2:43 am
SEDLIK v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court issued the decision in Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:16 am
(See DSM-V). [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 3:03 pm
In People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm
They are clearly on a roll when it comes to winning property rights cases at SCOTUS! [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
