Search for: "RONALD P EDWARDS"
Results 1 - 20
of 123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Ronald G. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The authors presented an adjusted OR of 15.58, with a p-value of 0.02. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm
Obstetrics & Gynaecology 961 (2019); Edward Purssell & Niall McCrae, “A Brief History of the Systematic Review,” chap. 2, in Edward Purssell & Niall McCrae, How to Perform a Systematic Literature Review: A Guide for Healthcare Researchers, Practitioners and Students 5 (2020). [2] John P. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
Gordon (ed) Pantheon 1980, p. 197) of the emerging era of human rights in the context of economic activity. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
Perkins & Ronald N. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 9:28 am
907 (2022); Edward K. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Rights, for Vermeule, are not to be taken as seriously as, for example, Ronald Dworkin does.[16] Instead, rights are properly subordinated to higher conceptions of the common good.[17] Vermeule, who takes a Catholic integralist view as the source of his own values, does not see rights as legally or politically central.[18] The same goes for democracy, which Vermeule sees as a contingent type of government, the value of which depends on whether it acts for the common good.[19] Without… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
” (p. 259).The report adds that Maskell was aided by Father Edward Neil Magnus, number 84, p. 249, ordained in 1963, at Keough from 1969 to 1972. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Murphy’s article Abandon Chevron and Modernize Stare Decisis for the Administrative State was cited in the following article: Ronald M. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:33 am
Mountsier - Tax Law Bryan P. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:33 am
Mountsier - Tax Law Bryan P. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:33 am
Mountsier - Tax Law Bryan P. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:33 am
Mountsier - Tax Law Bryan P. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In 1989, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit resolved an appeal involving expert witnesses who relied upon epidemiologic studies by concluding that it did not have to resolve questions of bias and confounding because the studies relied upon had presented their results with confidence intervals.[4] Judges and expert witnesses persistently interpreted single confidence intervals from one study as having a 95 percent probability of containing the actual parameter.[5]… [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In 1989, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit resolved an appeal involving expert witnesses who relied upon epidemiologic studies by concluding that it did not have to resolve questions of bias and confounding because the studies relied upon had presented their results with confidence intervals.[4] Judges and expert witnesses persistently interpreted single confidence intervals from one study as having a 95 percent probability of containing the actual parameter.[5]… [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
(Kyd, p. 25.) [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 10:34 am
• Ronald L. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 2:13 am
Mountsier - Tax Law (5 years) Bryan P. [read post]
