Search for: "Raabe v. Raabe"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In Guedes v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:01 pm
Last year, former Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab made changes to the Parole Board rules which prevented Prison and Probation staff from providing the Parole Board with recommendations regarding the release of imprisoned persons, However, it was held to be unlawful and reversed following its High Court challenge, R v Bailey. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
Dominic Raab subsequently told The Times: “It is disappointing to see this major Conservative reform, which can strengthen freedom of speech and help us deport more foreign criminals, dropped from the government’s agenda. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am
Vicarious liability in the Supreme Court On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
Raab responded to the demands by saying, “This issue is of the utmost importance and is being given urgent consideration. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am
Joshua Rozenberg, A Lawyer Writes: What’s the point of Dominic Raab? [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:18 am
It is a testament of predetermination, as Raab railed against the ‘increasing’ usage of SLAPPs, of an ‘abuse of the legal process’, of ‘improper means’, of a ‘chilling effect’ on free speech and, most obliquely of all, of some connection between SLAPPs and the war in Ukraine. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
The Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab claimed that this sets out a series of measures to prevent so-called SLAPPs. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
Details of a Bill of Rights to replace the Human Rights Act were revealed last week, with Justice Secretary Dominic Raab promising it will “reinforce freedom of speech”. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
In the 2014 case of Riley v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm
If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
Mr Raab was quoted as saying “‘I feel very strongly that the parameters of free speech and democratic debate are being whittled away, whether by the privacy issue or whether it’s wokery and political correctness. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Judgement was handed down by Nicklin J in Riley v Murray [2021] EWHC 3437 (QB) on 20 December 2021. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
" Relying upon Wyman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law that required abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges at a hospital and affirmed the Court’s previous decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
Facts: This case (Raab v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 5:01 am
Supreme Court in Treasury Employees v Van Raab, 109 S.Ct. 1384.In Van Raab the High Court examined the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 5:01 am
Supreme Court in Treasury Employees v Van Raab, 109 S.Ct. 1384.In Van Raab the High Court examined the U.S. [read post]
