Search for: "Raff v. Raff"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
In a note published in the New York University Law Review, Kenyon critiques Alt v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 12:00 am
Speaking of Courthouse news, David Ovalle @Davidovalle305 reported on the quick Guilty Verdict Wednesday in state v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 5:35 am
It is styled, Martha Shindoll v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:46 am
The Second Circuit cites a New York Court of Appeals ruling, Colon v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:11 am
Campbell v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 2:52 pm
Or at least rentals to riff-raff; read, less wealthy folks. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 6:06 pm
Compare Hammer v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 1:00 pm
” Oral argument also was held yesterday, as y’all likely know from Raff’s recap. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
And in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am
Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times writes about the oral arguments in Bahlul v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm
Raff already outlined the issues the en banc D.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:31 am
Turner v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:25 pm
Herr Kaymer was not impressedIn a case with facts not too dissimilar to those of Rihanna v Topshop (see IPKat report here) and rapper Riff Raff (see IPKat report here) the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf recently decided that a well-known sports personality may prevent the unauthorized dissemination of "pop art style" portraits of his image. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
James Franco's 'Alien v Riff Raff In order to enforce his right of publicity successfully in the US (this is a right which does not exist in the UK, as explained in the case of Rihanna)- a plaintiff must demonstrate the following criteria established in Eastwood v Superior Court (California Court of Appeal, 1983): (1) Defendant’s use of Plaintiff’s identity (2) Appropriation of… [read post]
2 May 2013, 5:04 pm
As Raff noted last week, the lawyers for the defendant-appellant in United States v. al-Bahlul–the military commission case in which the D.C. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:44 pm
As I noted then, the Attorney General’s invocation of the balancing test for due process articulated in Mathews v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
That's what Shelby County Circuit Judge Hub Harrington found in Burdette v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:53 am
Several privacy and antitrust complaints are now menacing Google. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm
Circuit’s reasoning in Gul v. [read post]
