Search for: "Railroad Company v. Alabama"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 9:12 am
Alabama Department of Revenue, No. 09-520, ruling in a railroad company’s favor in a dispute over fuel taxes in Alabama. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 7:14 pm
The case is Federal Insurance Company v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
The case is Illinois Central Railroad Company v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 5:50 am
Today is the 122st anniversary of the decision in Plessy v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Alabama Department of Revenue, which asks whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors from a generally applicable sales tax constitutes discrimination against railroads; and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
The case is CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
Tax systems treat taxpayers differently all the time, and the central question before the Court in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
In other words, should the railroad be compared to other commercial companies, many of which pay the 4% sales tax in Alabama? [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
Alabama Department of Revenue Docket: 09-520 Issue: Whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors, but not railroads, from a generally applicable sales and use tax is subject to challenge as “another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier” under Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
In its brief in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Abel v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
The federal law says that states cannot tax rail carriers in a discriminatory way; Alabama’s tax on diesel fuel applies only to railroads and not other transportation companies that are the railroads’ main competitors. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 4:19 pm
On September 22, 1993, at 0245 hours, this passenger train was attempting to transit a railroad bridge over Big Bayou Canot, near Mobile, Alabama. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
Alabama Dep't of Revenue, No. 08-12712 Alabama's sales and use tax on diesel fuel, with its exemptions for motor and water carriers, does not discriminate against railroad companies in violation of Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Regal-Beloit Corporation Docket: 08-1553; 08-1554 (this case was consolidated with Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
Alabama Department of Revenue Docket: 09-520 Issue: Whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors, but not railroads, from a generally applicable sales and use tax is subject to challenge as “another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier” under Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
