Search for: "Ransom v. United States of America"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 11:25 am
United States of America, et al. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm
Entitled “Combating Ransomware: One Year On,” the paper was drafted in consultation with leading experts in the field: V. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm
Disrupt & Dismantle Threat Actors Pillar 2 discussed the commitment to use “all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests,” focusing on heading off “sustained cyber-enabled campaigns that would threaten the national security or public safety of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
Pillar II: Disrupt and Dismantle Threat Actors As the new strategy begins by recognizing the range of significant threats posed by malicious actors, Pillar II opens with the statement: “The United States will use all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
In August, The Trace presented a conspiracy about the amicus briefs filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:07 am
On July 7, United States Patent & Trademark Office Director Kathi Vidal encouraged stakeholders to submit amicus briefs with a view to the Director review of the PTAB decisions in two cases involving challenges to patents asserted by VLSI Technology against Intel. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:28 am
United States (SCOTUS) EFF CFAA Revisions – Penalties and Access (EFF) Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Reform (EFF) Electoral Security: Election Security (EFF) Transcript Tarah: So in 2010, I was getting married for the first time. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:12 am
Maybe not a massive amount, since Mexican troops have never really invaded the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
See State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:03 am
Officials announced that the ransom demand amounted to about $51,000, but have not indicated whether the city paid the ransom. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
Thus, it should come as no surprise that a significant number of ransomware victims opt to pay the ransom. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]
Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
(Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council (13 June 2013), p. 11)In the United States of America, although federal civil rights legislation has had undeniable positive impact, many African Americans in particular struggle to achieve their rights to full equality. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Would this put the United States in breach of its international obligations? [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 6:47 am
And what about the ruse orchestrated by United States’ prosecutors to entice Ali into coming to America? [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:50 pm
Eugene Kontorovich (Northwestern) — who has guest-blogged here several times — passes along this item about today’s United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:47 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
Supreme Court in Regan v. [read post]
