Search for: "Rashid v. S"
Results 1 - 20
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 20 May 2024, there was a variation application in Rashid Naseer v Adil Farooq Raja QB-2022-002648. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
Netflix’s new hit series “Baby Reindeer” is a brutal account of former comedian Richard Gadd’s life in his twenties. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is seeking public input on how accurate training data impacts generative artificial intelligence models. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Read the ICO’s press release here. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
On 19 – 20 March 2024, there was a preliminary issues trial and application notice before Richard Spearman KC in the case of Rashid Naseer v Adil Farooq Raja QB-2022-002648. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
Ali’s statements. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:28 am
The case, if you want to google it, is James Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Corp., 84 NY2d 488; Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d at 225; and Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454, at 463). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Corp., 84 NY2d 488; Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d at 225; and Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454, at 463). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
It undertakes that exploration through a deep dialectic engagement with Jan Broekman’s, Knowledge in Change: The Semiotics of Cognition and Conversation (Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2023). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
On 22 March 2023, the defendant’s application for summary judgement was dismissed in the case of Frati v Bowen-Carter [2023] EWHC 627 (KB). [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Murray v Rashid, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2022 WL 17490799, 2022 N.Y. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm
The United States’s Doreen Bogdan-Martin will face Russia’s Rashid Ismailov in a vote that occurred Sept. 29. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
Aleksandr V. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm
In a judgment [pdf] given on 5 May 2021 but released last week along with other judgments in the case, Sir Andrew McFarlane has found that Sheikh Mohamed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, ruler of Dubai and Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates, hacked his ex-wife’s and her advisors’ phones during the London legal proceedings concerning the couple’s two children. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, the Court of Appeals, quoting Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, said that "To promote open government and public accountability, FOIL* imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, the Court of Appeals, quoting Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, said that "To promote open government and public accountability, FOIL* imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public. [read post]
16 May 2020, 4:36 am
United KingdomHis Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al Makhtoum v. [read post]
