Search for: "Reason v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm
” This is a major decision, and will have implications for free speech online, as the Court must soon consider similar facts in the social-media context in Murthy v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:30 am
In this lawsuit, the industry groups note that, “Congress has provided for automatic indexing in numerous other statutes, such as the cost of living increases for Social Security benefits. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
To qualify for ADR, a TRS member must show that their disability resulted from an "accident" sustained in the performance of their duties (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 605 [f]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 13-551). [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
To qualify for ADR, a TRS member must show that their disability resulted from an "accident" sustained in the performance of their duties (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 605 [f]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 13-551). [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
Surveillance On 15 May 2024, a London Administrative Court handed down its judgment in the case of ADL & Ors v SSHD [2024] EWHC 994 (Admin). [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Insurance/Administrative Law: SABS; Standard of ReviewYatar v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:37 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Respondents appeal.Initially, petitioners move to strike a footnote from respondents' reply brief on the ground that it contains matters that are outside the scope of the administrative record. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Respondents appeal.Initially, petitioners move to strike a footnote from respondents' reply brief on the ground that it contains matters that are outside the scope of the administrative record. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
There are at least four reasons why fiduciary conduct will remain in the spotlight for the foreseeable future. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The third cause of action alleges a violation of Executive Law § 296(4) of the NYSHRL, which provides that it is "an unlawful discriminatory practice for an educational institution to deny the use of its facilities to any person otherwise qualified or to permit the harassment of any student or applicant by reason of his race. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The third cause of action alleges a violation of Executive Law § 296(4) of the NYSHRL, which provides that it is "an unlawful discriminatory practice for an educational institution to deny the use of its facilities to any person otherwise qualified or to permit the harassment of any student or applicant by reason of his race. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
“The Greatest Art Theft in World History”: Nazi-Looted Art With the rise of National Socialism in Germany, the largest art theft in world history was initiated even before the outbreak of the Second World War. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 8:08 am
The majority reasoned that, when Khadr pleaded guilty, he signed a general waiver agreeing not to appeal for any reason. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
The court found some flaws in the First-Tier Tribunal’s reasoning but no legal issues. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm
The rule is part of the Biden administration’s effort to address the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
Client information needs to be protected; therefore, attorneys should avoid putting data such as social security numbers, dates of birth and addresses into these AI systems. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Supreme Court law which, in order to protect the administration of justice, allows a court to restrict a party’s extrajudicial speech that is “substantially likely to have a materially prejudicial effect” or that presents a “‘reasonable likelihood’ of a serious and imminent threat” to the integrity of the trial. [read post]