Search for: "Reed by and Through Reed v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 5:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
In the United States, however, the Alaska high court decision became an anomaly, not a trendsetter. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:34 pm
The many examples of negative theory at work include United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official court decisions ever published in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
You had Donald Trump, the President of the United States, lying about Section 230 over and over again. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am
In the United States, the law belongs to the people. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
Speakers include Harvard Law Professor Jonathan Zittrain; former Library Innovation law director Adam Ziegler; Ravel Law cofounders Nik Reed and Daniel Lewis; Free Law Project founder Mike Lissner; Legal Information Institute executive director Sara Frug; Angela Jaffee, account director at vLex and former national programs administrator for the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.Org; Harvard Law Professor Alexandra… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Americans who lived through the First Insurrection knew, to be sure, that Floyd would not be the one to pull the trigger on Lincoln. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
Reed then explicitly rejects the Lederman view, in a discussion which concludes: The United States is a constitutional democracy. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:43 pm
On January 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in two cases—Relentless v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
In the United States, the principle of data minimization is embedded firmly within the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act, through FTC enforcement activities, and in the host of state-level privacy laws and rules that have proliferated in recent years. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
To what extent should international climate change law be developed through negotiations or adjudication, by States or by courts? [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
So the more friction you add to an application directed at children the less likely it is that the parent is going to take the steps necessary to get through it because the competition, of course, is as I said, free, unfettered, widely available. [read post]
