Search for: "Regan v City of New York"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Regan. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
The approved program, designed to reduce traffic and pollution in New York City by funding improvements to mass transit, will take effect once the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) determines the final rates. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
Dist., 28 NY3d 455, 467; see also Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d at 1066; Jordan v City of New York, 41 AD3d at 660). [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
Dist., 28 NY3d 455, 467; see also Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d at 1066; Jordan v City of New York, 41 AD3d at 660). [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
Those exchanges have been illuminating but are tangential to the proposal I advanced in The New York Times. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am
But much of his fire was directed at a different approach that had been suggested in a New York Times op-ed by Laurence Tribe and Jeremy Lewin. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:11 am
And in Regan v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Publisher and distributor liability is consistent with the First Amendment, despite the chilling effect it might sometimes create, so long as it complies with the New York Times v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Shortly after commencing their employment with the City of New York, the New York City Employees' Retirement System [NYCERS] placed the petitioners [Members] in this CPLR Article 78 action in the Basic Tier 4, 62/5 Retirement Plan [the 62/5 plan] which provided for retirement with full benefits at age 62 after at least 5 years of credited member service. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Shortly after commencing their employment with the City of New York, the New York City Employees' Retirement System [NYCERS] placed the petitioners [Members] in this CPLR Article 78 action in the Basic Tier 4, 62/5 Retirement Plan [the 62/5 plan] which provided for retirement with full benefits at age 62 after at least 5 years of credited member service. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Rather, said the court, "[t]he board correctly determined that [Police Officer's] injury was not caused by an accident as defined in the New York City Administrative Code and applicable case law.Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Department of City of New York, 57 NY2d 1010, the Appellate Division observed that "not every line-of-duty injury will support an award of accidental… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Rather, said the court, "[t]he board correctly determined that [Police Officer's] injury was not caused by an accident as defined in the New York City Administrative Code and applicable case law.Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Department of City of New York, 57 NY2d 1010, the Appellate Division observed that "not every line-of-duty injury will support an award of accidental… [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:16 pm
City of New York (1998); INS v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
New Zealand On 12 December 2019 Clark J handed down judgment in the defamation and privacy case of Driver v Radio New Zealand Limited [2019] NZHC 3275. [read post]
