Search for: "Regional Recycling v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 12:45 pm
The Court also discussed as instructive the case of County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
Finally, the bill includes a number of tax reform provisions to help pay for the health care, energy, and environmental titles. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:42 pm
All three landfills are operated by the County subject to oversight and permits by the County Department of Environmental Health Services, the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
California et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE City of Oakland v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:00 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> DE Department of Natural Res. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
EPA and West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Consolidation Coal Company v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:55 am
The buildings ranked comply with the criteria of using green and innovative technologies including; efficient energy and water use, waste disposal, the use of recyclable materials in construction, sustainable use of space and use of natural lighting.The 30 654 square metre Department of Environmental Affairs building in Pretoria made the cut to achieve the prestigious six star rating – a category considered in line with international best practice. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm
Further, fracking activities may be authorized by the Division, upon notice by a well operator and prior to adoption of implementing regulations, upon numerous specified conditions including that “[t]he division conducts an environmental impact report (EIR) [as specified] pursuant to [CEQA], in order to provide the public with detailed information regarding any potential environmental impacts of well stimulation in the state. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit held in California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
The United States did not. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
