Search for: "Reno v. Baird (1998)" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
California Supreme Court Holds that Supervisors are not Personally Liable for Retaliation
4 Mar 2008, 5:41 pm
In Reno v. [read post]
Public Blawg - http://www.publiclawnews.com/blogs/public-blawg
California Supreme Court: No Individual Liability for Retaliation Under FEHA
3 Mar 2008, 8:16 pm
Back in 1998, the California Supreme Court ruled in Reno v. [read post]
What's New in Employment Law? - http://shawvalenza.blogspot.com/
California Supreme Court Takes Up Unique Disability Discrimination Case
11 May 2007, 6:20 pm
Here is the issue on appeal:This case presents the following issues: (1) In an action for employment discrimination and harassment by hostile work environment, does Reno v. [read post]
What's New in Employment Law? - http://shawvalenza.blogspot.com/
Sexual Harassment By Owner of Sacramento Company, Part 3 of 7
26 Aug 2009, 10:23 pm by Moseley Collins
Baird, (1998) 18 Cal.4th 640. [read post]
Sacramento Sexual Harassment Lawyer Blog - http://www.sacramentosexualharassmentlawyerblog.com/
California Expands Liability Under the FEHA to Business-Entity Agents
5 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm by Sara Alexis Levine Abarbanel
Specifically, in Reno v. [read post]
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives - https://www.foley.com/en/insights/blogs/labor-employment-law-perspectives
No Individual Supervisor Liability For Retaliation Even For Harassment Claims
21 Apr 2008, 5:05 pm
Baird, 18 Cal.4th 640, 643 (1998), pointing to the adverse consequences of subjecting supervisors to personal liability for personnel decisions, seems equally applicable to claims of retaliation based on reports of harassment. [read post]
California Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.callaborlaw.com/