Search for: "Rent v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 4,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
A landlord can refuse to rent the felon a place to live and employers can refuse to hire the person. [read post]
The Act makes it unlawful for data brokers to sell, license, rent, trade, transfer, release, disclose, provide access to, or otherwise make available personally identifiable sensitive data of a United States individual (i.e., people residing in the United States) to any foreign adversary or any entity controlled by a foreign adversary. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:00 am by Whitney Hodges
Supreme Court declined to hear appeals of two cases challenging the constitutionality of rent control – 74 Pinehurst, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am by David Aaron
It targets non-U.S. persons who are outside the United States and authorizes the government to compel certain communication service providers within the United States to assist the government in acquiring those targets’ communications. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Internal policies regarding the sharing of such data with the state should be updated. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm by Hugh Rennie
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:33 am by SHG
In Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:03 am by Giles Peaker
On 18 October 2023, Southwark had served an emergency prohibition order due to the state of the property. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am by Richard Hunt
After finding that Bowman failed to state a claim under Section 3604(f)(1) of the FHA because he did not allege any interest in buying or renting an apartment, Judge Starr turns to Section 3604(f)(2), which more broadly covers the privileges associated with renting an apartment, Judge Starr begins with his ADA analogy to distinguish accessibility barriers in places  to which Bowman had “lawful access” and those he did not. [read post]