Search for: "Richard v. Res Care, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
Richard Re (UVA) took the opposite position [see here and here]; he wrote: According to many commentators [e.g., me], the Court decided what was really a "fake" or "made up" case brought by someone who asserted standing merely because "she worries. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:59 am
Qwick Inc., No. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Hatcher, Injustice, Inc. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Danilack, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Sunday, February 4, 2024 Tags: Activism, AI, Artificial intelligence, data analytics, Environment, litigation, Public disclosures, Risk management, SEC, Sustainability, technology Caremark Claim Based on Business Risks Dismissed Posted by Richard Horvath, Stephen Leitzell, and Taylor Jaszewski, Dechert LLP, on Monday, February 5, 2024 Tags: Business risk, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, In re Caremark,… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Danilack, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Sunday, February 4, 2024 Tags: Activism, AI, Artificial intelligence, data analytics, Environment, litigation, Public disclosures, Risk management, SEC, Sustainability, technology Caremark Claim Based on Business Risks Dismissed Posted by Richard Horvath, Stephen Leitzell, and Taylor Jaszewski, Dechert LLP, on Monday, February 5, 2024 Tags: Business risk, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, In re Caremark,… [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Court’s recent decision in Segway, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Court’s recent decision in Segway, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and North Carolina Farm Bureau Federation v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
In § 3, experienced Florida attorneys, Richard T. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 11:55 am
” Olson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 7:08 am
Bedoya v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
”[4] Importantly, the authors of the statistics chapter named names; that is, they cited some cases that butchered the concept of the confidence interval.[5] The fourth edition will have a more difficult job because, despite the care taken in the statistics chapter, many more decisions have misstated or misrepresented the meaning of a confidence interval.[6] Citing more cases perhaps will disabuse federal judges of their reliance upon case law for the meaning of statistical concepts. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
And the expanding contexts in which users’ personal data is used—from health care and housing to employment and education—mean that what’s at stake with unlawful collection, use, retention, or disclosure is not just one’s subjective preference for privacy, but one’s access to opportunities in our economy and society, as well as core civil liberties and civil rights. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Compare In re NVIDIA Corp. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:40 am
Flowers Foods Inc., No. 1:20-cv-00411, and Bowen v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:36 pm
Of the Supreme Court members who will decide Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
