Search for: "Richards v. DOT"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
”[11] Next, the author entered the text prompt “Painting of the Brooklyn Bridge in winter in the style of Roy Lichtenstein,” which produced images with the bright primary reds and blues and swaths of polka dots and stripes characteristic of Lichtenstein’s pop art. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Richard M. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
“Expect a shock,” said Michael V. [read post]
29 May 2023, 7:15 am
The artwork is animated with colorful polka dots framing the girl’s face and she curiously looks at the viewer. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am
Ericsson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:32 pm
Supreme Court Ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 12:56 pm
Richard D. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
” (Reminiscent of Richard Nixon’s Watergate-era speech in which he said, “I am not a crook. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 3:50 am
With the use of “(cleaned up)” in the recent Brownback v. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 8:55 am
” Thus, like Yang v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:14 am
Additional Resources: Campbell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2018; Westlake, Hangzhou, China [西湖 杭州])It was my great delight to be able to participate in this year's 10th Annual Conference on "Politics, Law and Public Policy" (第十届“政治、法律与公共政策”年会) (more on that event HERE). [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:21 am
But to accept the limitations of the judiciary, whether one is a liberal or a conservative, requires accepting the possibility that the Constitution itself needs significant non-judicially-imposed amendment, which only promotes feelings of despair and hopelessness given the true awfulness of Article V. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:25 pm
Additional Resources: Pavik v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:25 pm
Additional Resources: Pavik v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
https://t.co/xiTSIPjKRr 2017-12-10 No Injunction for service to continue beyond termination https://t.co/cb65mvLVym v. [read post]
