Search for: "Richards v. Tate" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Richard Spearman KC dismissed the defamation claim in Griffin v North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm by Russell Knight
“[S]tate courts are the ultimate expositors of state law. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Helberger and Diakopoulos, ChatGPT and the AI Act (2023), Internet Policy Review 12(1) Kenney, Cortelyou C., Defamation 2.0 (2023), Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 56(1) Park, Eunice, The AI Bill of Rights: A Step in the Right Direction (2023), Orange County Lawyer Magazine, Vol. 65(2) McBride, Nicholas, ‘A Straightforward Case of Nuisance’: A Note on Fearn v Tate Gallery [2023] UKSC 4 (2023) Univer [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Given that “[s]tates rarely relinquish their sovereign powers,” she asserts, the Supreme Court has required “a clear statement in a compact that they have done so”. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 12:01 pm by Erik L. Johnson
  First, in July 2021, the FTC announced a settlement with Richard Berry, the owner and manager of four auto dealers, in the FTC’s action against Tate’s Auto for misrepresenting and falsifying terms in advertisements. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:22 am
Jarvis, The Case of the Magician’s Assistant: McAfoos v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:17 am by Christine Corcos
Jarvis, The Case of the Magician’s Assistant: McAfoos v. [read post]
“When multiple interventions were introduced early, they were very effective in 1918,” one of the researchers, Richard Hatchett, told the New York Times. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2020] EWCA Civ 104 (heard 21 and 22 January 2020). [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 4 and 5 February 2020 the Court of Appeal (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Canada Goose Retail v Persons Unknown. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Maryland Appellate Blog, Michael Wein notes that Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion in Rucho v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 6:51 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Richard Tracy, No. 113,763 (Sedgwick)Probation violation appeal (petition for review)Heather Cessna[Appeal dismissed; per curiam; June 19, 2020]Improper classification of prior convictionState v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 10:38 am by Mikhaila R. Fogel
Circuit denied a motion for an initial en banc hearing in Qassim v. [read post]