Search for: "Rivers Development, LLC Conditional Use" Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2023, 10:25 pm by Anthony Zaller
  While this was a significant development that California employers need to assess, there are a number of other new developments that occurred in July. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm by NARF
Mashantucket Pequot Gaming Enterprise (Dangerous Condition) Nambu v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 11:39 am by The White Law Group
   The CEO and mastermind of Future Income Payments LLC (FIP), formerly known as Pensions, Annuities, and Settlements LLC received a 10 year sentence in August 2022 after pleading guilty to fraud conspiracy. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Matthew Finkin
With such changes, the impact of the Viking River Cruises decision in California might be limited, but the l [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm by Kevin Jackson and Christopher Ward
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC “insofar as it precludes division of PAGA actions into individual and non-individual claims through an agreement to arbitrate. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 1:45 pm by Kevin Jackson and Christopher Ward
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC “insofar as it precludes division of PAGA actions into individual and non-individual claims through an agreement to arbitrate. [read post]
In the first published opinion interpreting Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), a statutory process to streamline review of eligible residential and mixed-use development projects, the developer filed suit challenging the City of Berkeley’s decision to deny the developer’s request to apply the SB 35 process to a mixed-use infill development on an existing parking lot. [read post]
In the first published opinion interpreting Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), a statutory process to streamline review of eligible residential and mixed-use development projects, the developer filed suit challenging the City of Berkeley’s decision to deny the developer’s request to apply the SB 35 process to a mixed-use infill development on an existing parking lot. [read post]
In the first published opinion interpreting Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), a statutory process to streamline review of eligible residential and mixed-use development projects, the developer filed suit challenging the City of Berkeley’s decision to deny the developer’s request to apply the SB 35 process to a mixed-use infill development on an existing parking lot. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
" The Supreme Court's decision in PennEast Pipeline Co., LLC v. [read post]
This order directs state agencies to pursue actions that will use the state’s lands and waters to sequester carbon. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
Twin Rivers Paper Co., 187 A.3d 10 (Me. 2018): The Maine Supreme Court examined the conflict between federal and state law regarding the medicinal and other uses of marijuana. [read post]