Search for: "Rivers et al v. State of Ohio et al" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
In 2020, following a long-term investigation into an individual’s cigarette smuggling activity, a process including court-authorized search warrants, wiretaps, grand jury subpoenas, and other investigative tools, New York seized more than $1.3 million in cash and 6,267 cartons of untaxed cigarettes, according to a press release from the Queens’ District Attorney.[2] But even law enforcement successes are costly and only stop a drop of water in the Hudson River of smuggling… [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 5:30 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
Defendant in the underlying Columbian case, Ministerio deAmbiente y Desarrollo Sostenible et al could file a motion to quash the subpoenas ordered by the Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html Petition for certiorari was denied in:White et al. v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am by Jamie Baker
The Regulatory Mentality and NCAA Satellite Camps (et al), 35 QUINNIPIAC L. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
  If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees,  you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Here, Muller et al. have created an excellent book with wide-reaching appeal whose focal point and strength are Bill Manbo's photographs. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:27 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court, in the case of Michigan, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm by Pace Law School Library
L. 807-811 (2011).Thomas, Seth M., et al. 2009-2010 environmental law survey. 44 Ind. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:53 pm by Mark Murakami
Interestingly, in justifying why the Supreme Court should review the denial of the injunction, the States assert that this is a common law case of nuisance between several states (Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania) on one hand, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers and "an instrumentality of Illinois" on the other hand. [read post]