Search for: "Robbins v. Secretary of State"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Scalise v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am
Robbins responded that private litigation is antithetical to the substantial enforcement power and discretion FNHRA accords states and the secretary of health and human services. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:54 am
Hudgens v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
The Court refused to read the request in the narrower fashion suggested by ACLJ, limiting it to communications by the Secretary’s “aides” and “staff,” namely, an identifiable group of DHS employees closest to the Secretary. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
Robbins and Chevron v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 6:18 am
Auer v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
United States Former Playboy model Karen McDougal filed her suit against Fox News in the Supreme Court of the state of New York. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
However, starting with United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
The 1964 Act banned the use of “help wanted female” for secretaries or nurses. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:46 am
Robbins. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm
Peter O’ Rourke, Acting Secretary of Veteran Affairs.37 Kisor is not a tax case, but its implications for taxpayers could be significant. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am
Robbins, in which Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for a unanimous court that the secretary of labor’s interpretation of his own regulations is “controlling unless ‘plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:19 am
Robbins and Bowles v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:50 am
Robbins should be overruled. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:51 pm
Secretary of the Army 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am
Secretary of the Army, 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
Secretary of the Army 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
