Search for: "Robert Wasserman" Results 1 - 20 of 212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am by jonathanturley
Sheryl Gay Stolberg  said that this week’s effort by Democrats to censor Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Although legislative gerrymandering plays a key role in letting representatives choose their constituents, the nation’s “urban/rural polarization” has been a much bigger factor over the past 25 years, Wasserman wrote. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 7:04 pm by Tom Smith
Jordan cut in and provided just such an example: the White House flagging a tweet from Robert Kennedy Jr. about vaccines for deletion. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), denounced me for offering “legal opinions” without actually working at Twitter. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Wasserman Rajec, Innovations in Pleasure Conscious effort to tout devices/drugs as medical, downplaying their recreational and pleasurable features. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 1:58 pm by Christopher J. Walker
Robert Brown (San Diego Law Review forthcoming) Regulatory Budgeting in the U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Project, (February 7, 2022).Robert Kahn, Face Veil Bans and “Living Together” – What’s Privacy Got to Do with It, (6 Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review 7 (2021).Sherif Girgis, Misreading and Transforming Casey for Dobbs, (Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 20, 2022).David Gans, Reproductive Originalism: Why the Fourteenth Amendment’s Original Meaning Protects the Right to Abortion, (SMU Law Review Forum (2022… [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 3:22 am by SHG
As such, the department asked Judge Robert L. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:30 am by James Romoser
(Ed Kilgore, New York magazine) SCOTUS vacates Knight Foundation, Thomas has things to say (Howard Wasserman, PrawfsBlawg) In Terry v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by James Romoser
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court restores requirements for medication abortions, siding with Trump administration (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Citing Taylor Swift, Supreme Court Seems Set to Back Nominal Damages Suits (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Supreme Court Considers Expanding Government Liability Over Speech Restrictions — Even After They Were Lifted (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) Supreme… [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Wasserman, writing for SCOTUSblog, explained the background of the case: Hungary arises from the nation that executed the Holocaust with a “speed and ferocity” unique among European nations. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 2:11 am by Steve Lubet
Writing on Prawfs, Howard Wasserman adds the obvious names Thurgood Marshall and William Howard Taft, to which I would add Louis Brandeis. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman ponders some process-oriented questions raised by Vance and Mazars and discusses potential implications for future cases. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
Howard Wasserman comments on the scope of nationwide injunctions by analyzing a footnote in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent, and James Phillips examines a footnote in Justice Elena Kagan’s concurrence and argues that it misreads the majority opinion Kagan joined in Our Lady of Guadalupe. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
(See my article with Howard Wasserman, The Process of Marriage Equality). [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, here and here. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
Philip Duggan and Robert Reese Oñate have a preview at Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “[t]he Supreme Court’s historic first teleconference oral argument went off relatively smoothly …, and its orderly round of questioning by the justices was enough to entice Justice Clarence Thomas, who usually asks no questions at hearings. [read post]