Search for: "Roeder v. Roeder" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Nonetheless, the Board found the connotations and commercial impressions of the marks to be "quite dissimilar" because of the presence of the word CREEK in applicant's mark.The circumstances of this case are very similar, if not identical, to those in Champagne Louis Roederer S.A. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am by Andrew Hamm
One of the term’s major cases was Janus v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Understanding the ADA, William Goren notes that the court’s opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” Now that the term has ended, Oliver Roeder at FiveThirtyEight examines the justices’ voting alignments. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:22 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Oliver Roeder on FiveThirtyEight: “The Supreme Court does not compute. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am by David Post
Scott Applewhite/Associated Press) Yes, says Oliver Roeder,  in an interesting essay at fivethirtyeight.com. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court removed securities-fraud case Leidos, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 3:46 am by Peter Mahler
In Morizio v Roeder, 2017 NY Slip Op 50248(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Feb. 17, 2017], Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
    Accounts of profits: CRISTAL clear when the other side doesn’t show upChampagne Louis Roederer v J Garcia Carrion [2017] EWHC 289(February 2017)Benny tasting some champagneMost trade mark cases are heard by way of split trial. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:12 am
The dispute related to a claim for infringement of Roederer's UK and EUTMs for the word CRISTAL. [read post]