Search for: "Rogers Holdings, II, LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
II. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
(Professor Farley and I propose such a test in Part III of our paper after we discuss the Rogers test in Part I and other speech-protective trademark doctrines like parody in Part II.) [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Lonestar Communications Corporation LLC v Kaye & Ors [2023] EWHC 421 (Comm). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:57 am
., LLC involves how to determine the law to be applied under federal admiralty law in a maritime contract case. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
Rogers v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
Rogers v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
He also disputes the relevance of Banneker Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:50 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(A)(ii). [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm
Experian Holdings, Inc., 978 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2020) (addressing Article III standing) Rogers v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 12:22 pm
[ii] You may be familiar with JHO’s line of BANG energy drinks. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
Northstar Spectrum, LLC), we see that Jeff Lamken argued against Seth Waxman, and that other legal heavyweights were on the respective briefs. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 10:35 am
§ 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A); Failed to have a HIPAA security training program, and failed to provide security training to its employees. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:30 am
Normalization Policy Towards Cuba: Obama and Trump Roger R. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:51 am
Judges Karen Henderson, Judith Rogers and Sri Srinivasan will review Roger Stone associate Andrew Miller’s appeal of an order holding him in contempt of court for his refusal to comply with subpoenas from Special Counsel Robert Mueller. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Those decisions—including one by then-Judge Clarence Thomas—were by judges who are as skeptical of antitrust as Judge Kavanaugh does, and they grossly exaggerated the actual holdings and language of the Supreme Court opinions. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm
AC JV, LLC, 2018 WL 3769799 (W.D. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:13 am
” [iii] Chief Justice Roger B. [read post]
