Search for: "Rogers v. Ashe"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:03 pm
Senator Roger Marshall and Rep. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
” AUGUST EPA announced a proposed rule that would eliminate a restriction on coal ash—the residue left after burning coal. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:58 am
In a precursor to its infamous Dred Scott decision, the Supreme Court in 1831 in Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
Rogers College of Law. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
In a partial dissent, Judge Rogers would hold that the allegations were sufficient to trigger claims under NEPA and the CWA. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
Darsie Rogers will also be stepping in as the region’s new special operations commander. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
But the jury’s conclusion that Hinckley was insane is now binding on the government, and thus precludes a retrial for murder: Under the “collateral estoppel” doctrine (Ashe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:30 am
Hrynew http://t.co/xtdAJlOQoh -> Good faith and honesty contractual obligations says Supreme Court: Bhasin v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:45 am
The TTAB panel will consist of Chief Judge Gerard Rogers, Judge Susan Hightower and Judge Linda Kuczma. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:36 pm
But the jury’s conclusion that Hinckley was insane is now binding on the government, and thus precludes a retrial for murder: Under the “collateral estoppel” doctrine (Ashe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
– Marcus v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:29 am
Read People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
Siemens (Green Patent Blog) Smith & Wesson – ALJ Rogers sets target date in Certain Muzzle-Loading Firearms (337-TA-777) (ITC Law Blog) Wham-O – FLFMC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am
As is customary at these times everyone became an expert on volcanic ash and the effect it has on aircraft engines. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm
In the leading case of McKennitt v Ash ([2006] EWCA Civ 1714; [2008] QB 73) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the English law took a similar approach. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
” It appears that a “public domain” defence will justify the publication of information which would otherwise be protected by Article 8 only if the information has been so widely and fully publicised that its further publication could not reasonably be expected to cause damage or distress to the person concerned (see Toulson & Phipps Confidentiality at [7-071]; Green Corns v Claverley Group Ltd [2005] 2 FCR 309 (Tugendhat J) at [69]-[81]; McKennitt v… [read post]
